Palavras-chave
Prosody
Illocution
Speech corpus
Como Citar
Resumo
According to Language into Act Theory, the identification of illocutionary types in speech is based on two premises: a) the speaker's affect is the activating force of illocution; b) prosodic contours convey the illocutionary force. This paper aims to clarify both assumptions by presenting arguments that link affect to prosody and prosody to pragmatic activities. The first part is dedicated to sketching the theoretical framework (Human Birth Theory), grounding the concept of affect, which must be distinguished from emotion and attitude. It focuses on its application to the domain of language performance and the relation between affect and prosody. The second part presents empirical arguments supporting the idea that prosodic contours guide the interpretation of illocution. The “Taken-for-granted assertions,” “Evident assertions,” “Requests for confirmation,” and “Open questions,” illocutionary types not identified in previous corpus-based taxonomies, are shaped by dedicated prosodic contours and defined according to pragmatic parameters. Parameters are scalar and connected to the speaker’s affective force: a) the speaker’s commitment to the truth, the relevance of the content, and the speaker’s affective involvement for assertions; b) the speaker’s estimation of the addressee’s knowledge, the type of linguistic behavior requested, and the speaker’s affective involvement for questions. The distinction between prosodic contours bearing illocutionary value and the prosodic properties that are a function of the speaker’s attitude is faced, showing that the latter does not change the prosodic model. The comparison between “Taken for granted assertion” and “Open question” shows how subtle prosodic cues can change the pragmatic interpretation.
Referências
1. Anolli L, Ciceri R. La voce delle emozioni. Verso una semiosi della comunicazione vocale non-verbale delle emozioni. Milano: Franco Angeli;1999.
2. Aristotele. Retorica. Milano: Mondadori; 1996.
3. Arnold MB. Emotion and personality. New York: Columbia University Press;1960.
4. Austin JL. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1962.
5. Avesani C, Bonifacio S, Calignano G, D’Aloia V, Olivucci F, Vayra M, Zmarich C. The emergence of lexical and post-lexical prominence in Italian. A case study. In: Orrico R., Schettino L., editors. La Posizione del Parlante nell’Interazione: Atteggiamenti, Intenzioni ed Emozioni nella Comunicazione. Milano: Officina21; 2022. p. 11-34.
6. Balog HL, Brentari D. The relationship between early gestures and intonation. First Language. 2008; 28: 141–63.
7. Barbosa P, Raso T. Spontaneous speech segmentation: functional and prosodic aspects with applications for automatic segmentation. Revista de estudio do da linguagem, 2018; 26(4): 397-1433.
8. Bates E, Benigni L, Bretherton I, Camaioni L, Volterra V. The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press; 1979.
9. Biber D, Johansson S, Leech G, Conrad S, Finegan E. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman; 1999.
10. Blanche-Benveniste C. Approches de la langue parlée en français. Paris: Ophrys; 1997.
11. Braun B, Dehé N, Neitsch J, Wochner D, Zahner K. The prosody of rhetorical and information-seeking questions in German. Language and Speech. 2019; 62(4): 779–807.
12. Bruner E. La mente oltre il cranio. Roma: Carocci; 2018.
13. Bunt H, Petukhova V, Traum D, Alexandersson J. Dialogue Acts Annotation with the ISO 24617-2 Standard. In: Dahl D., editor. Multimodal Interaction with W3C Standards Toward Natural User Interfaces to Everything. Berlin: Springer; 2017. p. 1-27.
14. Calesini I. Fagioli’s Human Birth Theory and the possibility to cure mental illness, International Journal of Environment and Health. 2017; 8(3):185–192.
15. Chomsky N. Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper & Row; 1966.
16. Chomsky N. Knowledge of language: its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger; 1986.
17. Colgan P. Animal Motivation. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.
18. Conti EM. From animal instinct to Human Birth Theory: An entangled path, International Journal of Environment and Health. 2019; 9(4): 343–371.
19. Cresti E. Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca; 2000.
20. Cresti E. The empirical foundation of illocutionary classification. In: De Meo A, a Dovetto FM., editors. Atti del convegno, La comunicazione parlata, Roma: Aracne; 2017. p. 243-264.
21. Cresti E. The pragmatic analysis of speech and its illocutionary classification according to the language into act theory. In: Izre’el S., Mello H., Panunzi A., Raso T., editors. In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language: A Corpus-Driven Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2020. p. 181-220.
22. Cresti E. Topic vs. Allocutive in the Language into Act Theory. Corpus-based research on spoken Italian. In: Cimmino D, Ozerov P., editors., Disentangling Topicality Effects, Special issue, Linguistic Typology at the Crossroad, forthcoming.
23. Cresti E, Moneglia M., editors. C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated reference corpora for spoken romance languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2005.
24, Cresti E, Moneglia M. The role of prosody for the expression of illocutionary types. The prosodic system of questions in spoken Italian and French according to Language into Act Theory. Frontiers in Communication. 2023; 8(1).
25. Cresti E, Moneglia M. The role of prosody for the expression of illocutionary force. Variation of Speech act types within the assertive class in spoken Italian. In: Atti del LVII Convegno internazionale della Società di linguistica italiana, forthcoming.
26. Damasio A. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain, New York: Putnam & Sons; 1994.
27. De Marco A, Paone E. Dalle emozioni alla voce, Nuovi orizzonti della comunicazione in italiano L2, Roma: Carocci; 2016.
28. Descartes R. Le passioni dell’anima. Milano: Bompiani; 2003.
29. De Simone G. Conoscenze e affetti. Il dire e il fare in psicoterapia. In: Lalli N, Cavaggioni G, Fiori-Nastro P., editors. Il processo terapeutico in psicoterapia. Roma: Edizioni Universitarie Romane; 1994. p. 158-183.
30. D’Odorico L. Lo sviluppo linguistico. Roma: Laterza; 2005.
31. D'Odorico L, Franco F. Selective production of vocalization types in different communication contexts. Journal of Child Language. 1991; 18: 475–99.
32. Ekmann P. Emotion in the Human Face. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1982.
33. Ekmann P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion. 1992; 6(3/4): 169–200.
34. Ellsworth PC. Some implications of cognitive appraisal theories of emotion. In: Strongman KT., editor. International review on Research on emotions. New York: Riley; 1991. p. 143-161.
35. Ellsworth HA, Smith CA. Shades of Joy: Patterns of Appraisal Differentiating Pleasant Emotions. Cognition and Emotion. 1988; 2(4): 301–331.
36. Esteve-Gibert N, Prieto P. Prosody signals the emergence of intentional communication in the first year of life: evidence from Catalan-babbling infants. Journal of Child Language. 2012; 40: 1–26.
37. Fagioli M. Istinto di morte e conoscenza: pensieri di psicoanalisi. Roma: Armando; 19721; Istinto di morte e conoscenza. Roma: L'Asino d'oro; 201714.
38. Fagioli M. La marionetta e il burattino. Roma: Armando; 19741; Roma: L'Asino d'oro edizioni; 2011.
39. Fagioli M. Teoria della nascita e castrazione umana. Roma: L'Asino d'oro edizioni; 2012 (19751).
40. Fagioli M. Bambino, donna e trasformazione dell’uomo. Roma: Nuove Edizioni Romane; (19801).
41. Fagioli M. Left 2006. Roma: L'Asino d'oro; 2009.
42. Fagioli M. Left 2016-2017. Roma: L'Asino d'oro; 2019.
43. Fagioli M. Negazione e rifiuto. Il Sogno della farfalla. 2000; IX(1): 9-14.
44. Fagioli M. Leggendo WR. Bion. Il Sogno della farfalle. 2024; XXXIII (2); 53-101.
45. Fagioli Marcella. La parola dell’inconscio. Roma: L'Asino d'oro edizioni; 2025.
46. Firenzuoli V. Le forme intonative di valore illocutivo dell'italiano parlato: analisi sperimentale di un corpus di parlato spontaneo (LABLITA) [PhD thesis]. Università di Firenze; 2003.
47. Flax J, Lahey M, Harris K, Boothroyd A. Relations between prosodic variables and communication function. Journal of Child Language. 1991; 18: 3–19.
48. Furrow D. Young children's use of prosody. Journal of Child Language. 1984; 11(1): 203–213.
49. Gervain J. Plasticity in early language acquisition: the effects of prenatal and early childhood experience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2015; 35: 13–20.
50. Gervain J, Mehler J. Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life. Annual Review of Psychology. 2010; 61:191-218.
51. Ghio M, Cara C, Tettamanti M. The Prenatal brain readiness for speech processing: A review on fetal development of auditory and primordial language networks. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2021; 709-719.
52. ’t Hart J. Psychoacoustic backgrounds of pitch contour stylization. IPO Ann. Prog. Rep. 1976; 11: 11–19.
53. 't Hart J, Collier R, Cohen A. A Perceptual Study on Intonation. An Experimental Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; 1990.
54. Herder JG. Saggio sull’origine del linguaggio (Amicone AP. editor ) Parma: Nuova Pratiche Editrice; 1995.
55. Hewes GW. A History of the Study of Language Origins and the Gestural Primacy Hypothesis. In: Lock A, Peters CR., editors. Handbook of human symbolic evolution. Oxford: OUP; 1996. p. 263–269.
56. Husserl E. Ricerche logiche (G. Piana ed.) Milano: Il Saggiatore; 2015.
57. Husserl E. Fenomenologia dell’inconscio. I casi limite della coscienza. (Failla M. editor). Milano: Mimesis; 2021.
58. Izre’el S, Mello H, Panunzi A, Raso T. (2020). In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language: A Corpus-Driven Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2020.
59. James W. What is an Emotion?. Mind Association. 1884; 9(34): 188–205.
60. Johnstone T, Scherer K. The effects of Emotions on Voice Quality. In: Ohala JJ, Hasegawa Y, Ohala M, Granvillew D, Bayley AC., editors. Proceedings of 14th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences, Berkeley: University of California; 1999. p. 2029-2032.
61. Kawaguchi Y, Zaima S, Takagaki T., editors, Spoken Language Corpus and Linguistics Informatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2006.
62. Kohler K. Pragmatic and Attitudinal Meanings of Pitch Patterns in German Syntactically Marked Questions. In: Fant G, Fujisaki H, Cao J, Xu Y., editors. From Traditional Phonology to Modern Speech Processing. Bejing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press; 2004. p. 205–214.
63. Lacan J. Le Stad du Miroir comme formateur de la fonction de Je, telle qu’elle nous est revelee dans l’experience psychoanalytique. Revue Francaise de Psychanalyse. 1949; 13: 449–455.
64. Leech G. The Pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
65. Long MA, Cruikshank SJ, Jutras MJ, Connors BW. Abrupt maturation of a spike-synchronizing mechanism in neocortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 2005; 25: 7309 –7316.
66 Luma M, Moraes J, Rillard A. Statistical modeling of prosodic contours of four speech acts in Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody; 2020. p. 404–408.
67. Magno-Caldognetto E. I correlati fonetici delle emozioni. In: Bazzanella C, Kobau P., editors. Passioni, emozioni, affetti. Miano: McGraw-Hill; 2002. p. 197-213.
68. Mariani B, Nicoletti G, Barzon G, Ortiz Barajas MC, Shukla M, Guevara R, Suweis SS, Gervain J. Prenatal experience with language shapes the brain. Science advances. 2023; 9(47) Avaliable from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10664997/
69. Mahoney H, Schmidt T. The cognitive impact of light: illuminating ipRGC circuit mechanism. Nature Review Neuroscience. 2024; 25: 159-175.
70. Martin Ph. WinPitch Corpus, a Text to Speech Alignment Tool for Multimodal Corpora. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04), Lisbon, Portugal. Paris: ELRA; 2004.
71. Martin Ph. The structure of Spoken language. Intonation in Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
72. Mello H, Panunzi A, Raso T, editors. Pragmatics and Prosody. Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation. Florence: Florence University Press; 2012.
73. Moneglia M. The C-Oral-Rom resource. In: Cresti E, Moneglia M., editors. C-ORALROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2005. p. 1-70.
74. Moneglia M. Le unità di riferimento per l’espressione delle emozioni: dati dal corpus C-ORAL-ROM. In: Magno Caldognetto E, Cavicchio F, Cosi P., editors. Comunicazione parlata e manifestazione delle emozioni. Atti del I convegno GSCP. Napoli: Liguori; 2008.
75. Moneglia M. Spoken corpora and Pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguìstica Aplìcada. 2011; 11(2): 479-519.
76. Moneglia M. Le unità di informazione Parentetiche alla periferia destra del Comment nella Teoria della Lingua in Atto. DILEF. 2021; 1(1):88-123
77. Moneglia M, Raso T. Notes on the Language into Act Theory. In: Raso T, Mello H., editors. Spoken corpora and linguistics studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2014. p. 468–494.
78. Moneglia M, Cresti E. Il Topic modale. In: Mollica A, Onesti C, editors. Studi in onore di Carla Marello. Welland (ON) Canada: éditions Soleil; 2022. p. 203-224.
79. Moraes J. From a Prosodic Point of View: Remarks on Attitudinal Meaning. In: Mello H, Panunzi A, Raso T., editors. Pragmatics and Prosody. Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation. Florence: Florence University Press; 2012. p. 19–37.
80. Moraes J, Rillard A. Illocution, Attitudes, and Prosody: a multimodal analysis. In: Raso T, Mello H., editors. Spoken corpora and linguistics studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2014. p. 233-270.
81. Nicolas C. C-or- Di Al. Corpus Oral Didactico Anotado Linguisticamente. Madrid: Liceus; 2012.
82. Orrico R, Schettino L., editors. La Posizione del Parlante nell’Interazione: Atteggiamenti, Intenzioni ed Emozioni nella Comunicazione Verbale. Milano: Officina21; 2022.
83. Perani D, Saccumanni MC, Scifo P, Spada D, Andreoli G, Rovelli R, Baldoli C, Koelsch S. Functional specializations for music processing in the human newborn brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010; 107 (10): 4758–4763.
84.Papaeliou CF., Trevarthen C. Prelinguistic pitch patterns expressing ‘communication’ and ‘apprehension’. Journal of Child Language. 2006; 33: 163–78.
85. Plutchik R. Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New Yor: Harper & Row; 1980.
86. Poggi I, Magno-Caldognetto E. Il parlato emotivo. Aspetti cognitivi, linguistici e fonetici. In: Albano- Leoni F, Cutugno F, Pettorino M, Savy R., editors. Atti del Convegno “Italiano Parlato. Napoli: D’Auria (CD rom) 2004.
87. Polese D, Riccio ML, Fagioli M, Mazzetta A, Fagioli F, Parisi P, Fagioli M. The Newborn's Reaction to Light as the Determinant of the Brain's Activation at Human Birth., Frontiers, Integrative Neurosciences, 2022; 16.
88. Polli D, Altoè P, Weingart O, Spillane KM, Manzoni C, Brida D, Tomasello G, Orlandi G, Kukura P, Mathies RA, Garavelli M, Cerullo G. Conical intersection dynamics of the primary photoisomerization event in vision. Nature. 2010; Sep 23. 467(7314):440-3.
89. Proust M. À la recherche du temps perdu. Paris: Gallimard; 1987.
90. Raso T, Mello H., editors. C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência de português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizont: Editora UFMA; 2012.
91. Raso T, Mello H., editors. Spoken corpora and linguistics studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2014.
92. Rocha B. 2016. Uma metodologia empírica para a identificação e descrição de ilocuções e a sua aplicação para o estudo da Ordem em PB e Italiano [PhD thesis]. Belo Horizonte: UFMG; 2016.
93. Rossi M. Le seuil de glissando ou seuil de perception des variations tonales pour la parole. Phonetica. 1971; 23: 1-33.
94. Rossi M. La perception des glissando descendants dans les contours prosodiques. Phonetica. 1978; 35: 11–40.
95. de Saussure F. Corso di linguistica generale. (Tullio De Mauro editor). Roma: Laterza; 1967.
96. Savino M. The intonation of Polar Question in Italian: where is the rise? Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 2012; 42(1): 23-48.
97. Sbisà M. Essays on Speech Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2023.
98. Scherer K. Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin. 1986; 99: 143-65.
99. Scherer K. Corpus design for studying the expression of emotion in speech. In: Raso T, Mello H., editors. Spoken corpora and linguistics studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2014. p. 210-32.
100. Scherer K. The Dynamic Architecture of Emotion: Evidence for the Component Process Model. Cognition and Emotion. 2009; 23(7): 1307–51.
101 Searle J. A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. In: Searle J., editor. Expression and meaning: studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979. p. 1–29.
102. Searle J, Vanderveken D. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
103. Swerts M. Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1997; 10(1): 514–21.
104. Tinsley JN, Molodtsov MI, Prevedel R, Wartmann D, Espigulé-Pons J, Lauwers M, Vaziri A. Direct detection of a single photon by humans. Nature Communications. 2016; 7: Article number: 12172.
105. Weiner B. An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review. 1985; 92(4): 548-94.
106. Vanrell MM, Mascaró I, Torres-Tamarit F, Prieto P. Intonation as an encoder of speaker’s certainty: information and confirmation yes–no questions in Catalan. Language and Speech. 2013; 56(2): 163-90.
107. Weisser M. DART – the Dialogue Annotation and Research Tool. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 2016; 12 (2): 355–388.
108. Weisser M. How to Do Corpus Pragmatics on Pragmatically Annotated Data: Speech Acts and Beyond. Amsterdam, Benjamins; 2018.
Online resources:
109. DAMSL: <https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/projects/eagles/restrict/manual.htm>
110. DIT++:< http://dit.uvt.nl/>
111. LABLITA CORPUS <http://corpus.lablita.it>/
112. Winpitch <https://www.winpitch.com/>
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Emanuela Cresti