Resumo
This paper proposes a revision of the status of the long parenthetical (i.e., formed by more than one phonological word) within the theoretical framework of Language into Act Theory (L-AcT). Using empirical evidence from spontaneous speech corpora, we argue that the long parenthetical should not be understood as a non-illocutionary informational unit within an informational pattern but rather as a distinct discursive level. Our findings indicate that the parenthetical level temporarily suspends the illocutionary level, allowing the speaker to momentarily distance themselves from the here and now of the ongoing utterance to provide additional metalinguistic information or perform secondary illocutions. We show evidence that indicates that the parenthetical level is structured around illocutionary units, follows the same organizational principles as other discursive levels, and exhibits distinct prosodic characteristics, including lower average f0 and higher articulation rate. Additionally, we show that the parenthetical level is recursive and can also occur within the metaillocutionary level. Finally, evidence from gestural studies suggests that transitions to the parenthetical level are accompanied by systematic changes in gestural pattern, similarly to how it occurs at the metaillocutionary level.
Referências
1. Cresti E. Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca; 2000.
2. Bühler K. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer; 1934.
3. Moneglia M, Raso T. Appendix: Notes on the Language into Act Theory. In: Raso T, Mello H, editors. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2014. p. 468-95.
4. Cavalcante FA. The information unit of topic: a crosslinguistic, statistical study based on spontaneous speech corpora [PhD thesis]. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2020.
5. Austin JL. How to do things with words. 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1975.
6. Nencioni G. Parlato-parlato, parlato-scritto, parlato-recitato. In: Nencioni G, editor. Di scritto e di parlato. Bologna: Zanichelli; 1983. p. 126-79.
7. Barbosa PA, Raso T. Spontaneous speech segmentation: functional and prosodic aspects with applications for automatic segmentation / A segmentação da fala espontânea: aspectos prosódicos, funcionais e aplicações para a tecnologia. Rev Estud Linguagens [Internet]. 2018 Oct;26(4):1361-96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.26.4.1361-1396.
8. Raso T, Teixeira B, Barbosa P. Modelling automatic detection of prosodic boundaries for Brazilian Portuguese spontaneous speech. J Speech Sci [Internet]. 2020;9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v9i00.14957.
9. Raso T, Mello H. C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG; 2012.
10. Barros CA, Mello HR, Albuquerque M, Raso T. Brazilian Gestural Corpus (BGEST) [Internet]. OSF; 2024 Nov 19.
11. Raso T, Rocha B, Salgado JV, Cruz BF, Mantovani LM, Mello H. The C-ORAL-ESQ project: a corpus for the study of spontaneous speech of individuals with schizophrenia. Lang Resour Eval. 2023;58(3):903-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-023-09675-y.
12. Cresti E. La stanza: un’unità di costruzione testuale del parlato. In: Ferrari A, editor. Sintassi storica e sincronica dell’italiano. Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione. Atti del X Congresso della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana (Basilea, 30 giugno–3 luglio 2008). Firenze: Franco Cesati Editore; 2009. p. 713-32.
13. Saccone V, Vieira M, Panunzi A. Complex illocutive units in the Language into Act Theory: an analysis of non-terminal prosodic breaks of bound comments and lists. J Speech Sci [Internet]. 2018;7(2):51-64. Available from: http://revistas.iel.unicamp.br/joss.
14. Tucci I. Obiter dictum: la funzione informativa delle unità parentetiche. In: Pettorino M, Giannini A, Dovetto FM, editors. La comunicazione parlata 3. Napoli: Università l’Orientale Press; 2010. p. 635-54.
15. Santos SM, Bossaglia G. Morphosyntactic, prosodic, functional and distributional description of the information unit of Parenthesis in spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Caletroscópio [Internet]. 2018;6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.58967/caletroscopio.v6.nesp.2018.3829.
16. Santos SM. Parentético e outras unidades informacionais curtas: uma distinção através da análise das diferentes realizações prosódicas do lexema "assim" [Master’s dissertation]. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2020.
17. Saccone V, Panunzi A. Le strutture parentetiche nel parlato italiano: classificazione funzionale e identificazione prosodica. In: Castagneto M, Ravetto M, editors. La comunicazione parlata / Spoken communication. Roma: Aracne Editrice; 2023. p. 461-86.
18. Raso T, Santos S. Short information units: a corpus-based prosodic study on the lexeme "assim" in Brazilian Portuguese. J Speech Sci [Internet]. 2019;8(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v8i2.14994.
19. Cresti E. The illocution-prosody relationship and the information pattern in spontaneous speech according to the Language into Act Theory (L-AcT). Linguist Online [Internet]. 2018;88(1):33-62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.88.4122.
20. Barros CA. A relação entre unidades gestuais e quebras prosódicas: o caso da unidade informacional de parentético [Master’s dissertation]. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2021.
21. Bicalho de Albuquerque M. Gestures and multilevel discourse in spontaneous speech corpora: the case of reported speech. DILEF - Riv Digit Dipart Lett Filos [Internet]. 2024;III(2023/3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35948/DILEF/2024.4346.
22. Saccone V. Le unità dello scritto e del parlato a confronto: il caso della Stanza [PhD thesis]. Firenze, Basel: Università degli Studi di Firenze & Università di Basilea; 2021.
23. Saccone V, Trombetta C. Parenthetical units and structures in Italian and German spoken language: prosodic and textual analysis. Chimera. 2021;8:1-23.
24. Cantalini G. La gestualità co-verbale nel parlato spontaneo e nel recitato. Annotazione del gesto e correlati prosodici in campioni comparabili di attori italiani [PhD thesis]. Roma: Università Roma Tre; 2018.
25. Cantalini M, Moneglia M. The annotation of gesture and gesture/prosody synchronization in multimodal speech corpora. J Speech Sci [Internet]. 2020;9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v9i00.14956.
26. Kendon A. Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Bruno Rocha
