Banner Portal
Mudanças tecnológicas, mercado de trabalho e desigualdades: conceitos e evidências para análise
Capa da Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho (RBEST), Volume 8, correspondente ao ano de 2026
PDF

Palavras-chave

Trabalho em plataforma
Mudança tecnológica
Desigualdades
Proteção social

Metrica

Como Citar

Lanzara, A. P. ., Lima, Y. O. ., Silva, B. S. ., & Boschi, R. R. (2026). Mudanças tecnológicas, mercado de trabalho e desigualdades: conceitos e evidências para análise. RBEST Revista Brasileira De Economia Social E Do Trabalho, 8, e026009. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbest.v8i00.21087

Resumo

O artigo analisa os impactos da digitalização e das tecnologias emergentes no mercado de trabalho e nas desigualdades sociais, com foco no Brasil e outros contextos internacionais. Destaca-se o crescimento do trabalho em plataformas digitais, caracterizado por autonomia aparente, flexibilidade e remuneração relativamente atrativa, mas marcado por precariedade, informalidade e ausência de proteção social. A expansão dessas formas de emprego ocorre em meio à desregulamentação trabalhista, à redução do poder sindical e à polarização de salários. O estudo evidencia que as instituições do mercado de trabalho, mais do que a tecnologia em si, determinam os efeitos sobre desigualdade e mobilidade ocupacional. Conclui-se que políticas públicas, regulação trabalhista e fortalecimento sindical são essenciais para proteger trabalhadores digitais e mitigar riscos da economia digital. 

PDF

Referências

Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks, and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 1043–1171). Elsevier-North Holland.

Amable, B. (2016). Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1), 79–103.

Autor, D., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553–1597.

Baccaro, L., Blyth, M., & Pontusson, J. (Eds.). (2022). Diminishing returns: The new politics of growth and stagnation. Oxford University Press.

Bensusán, G. (2016). Organizing workers in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico: The authoritarian-corporatist legacy and old institutional designs in a new context. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 16, 131–161.

Beaudry, P., Green, D. A., & Sand, B. (2013). The great reversal in the demand for skill and cognitive tasks. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(1), 199–247.

Beaudry, P., Green, D. A., & Sand, B. (2014). The declining fortunes of the young since 2000. American Economic Review, 104(5), 381–386.

Behrendt, C., Nguyen, Q. A., & Rani, U. (2019). Social protection systems and the future of work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers. International Social Security Review, 72, 17–41.

Boyer, R., & Saillard, Y. (Eds.). (2002). Regulation theory: The state of the art. Routledge.

Busemeyer, M., & Iversen, T. (2012). Collective skill systems, wage bargaining, and labor market stratification. In M. Busemeyer & T. Iversen (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 205–233). Oxford University Press.

Busemeyer, M. (2022). Digitalization, automation, and the welfare state: What do we (not yet) know? In M. R. Busemeyer, A. Kemmerling, P. Marx, & K. Van Kersbergen (Eds.), Digitalization and the welfare state (pp. 21–40). Oxford University Press.

Cardoso, A. M. (2024). Negociação coletiva no Brasil. Annablume.

Casilli, A., & Posada, J. (2019). The platformization of labor and society. In M. Graham & W. S. Dutton (Eds.), Society and the internet: How networks of information and communication are changing our lives (pp. 293–306). Oxford University Press.

Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP). (2023). Mobilidade urbana e logística de entregas: Um panorama sobre o trabalho de motoristas e entregadores com aplicativos (Coordenação V. Callil & M. F. Picanço). https://amobitec.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/AmobitecFinal08mai23-1.pdf

Collier, R. B., Dubal, V., & Carter, C. (2018). Disrupting regulation, regulating disruption: The politics of Uber in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16, 919–937.

Crouch, C. (2009). Privatised Keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11, 382–399.

Culpepper, P., & Thelen, K. (2020). Are we all Amazon primed? Consumers and the politics of platform power. Comparative Political Studies, 53(2), 288–318.

Dubet, F. (2010). Le places et les chances: Repenser la justice sociale. Seuil.

Dukes, R., & Streeck, W. (2023). Democracy at work: Contract, status and post-industrial justice. Polity Press.

Funke, C., & Picot, G. (2021). Platform work in a coordinated market economy. Industrial Relations, 52, 348–363.

Galvão, A. (2025, 16 janeiro). Deslegitimado pela lei, abandonado pela base? Repercussões da reforma trabalhista sobre o movimento sindical. Phenomenal World. https://www.phenomenalworld.org/pt-br/analises/deslegitimado-pela-lei-abandonado-pela-base/

Gould, E. (2019, March 15). Higher returns on education can’t explain growing wage inequality. [EPI Working Economics Blog], Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/blog/higher-returns-on-education-cant-explain-growing-wage-inequality/

Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 33–50.

Hacker, J., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer – and turned its back on the middle class. Simon & Schuster.

Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.

Hopkin, J. (2020). Anti-system politics: The crisis of market liberalism in rich democracies. Oxford University Press.

Howell, D. R., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2024). Labour market inequality: A comparative political economy perspective. Oxford Open Economics, 3(1), 940–950.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2023). Características adicionais do mercado de trabalho 2022: Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv102025_informativo.pdf

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2025). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua: Trabalho por meio de plataformas digitais 2024. https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/media/com_mediaibge/arquivos/59722d4ac24bd853f52f54f12b9514f7.pdf

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2024). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2024. International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@inst/documents/publication/wcms_908142.pdf

Iversen, T. (1999). Contested economic institutions: The politics of macroeconomics and wage bargaining in advanced democracies. Cambridge University Press.

Iversen, T., & Rehm, P. (2022). The data revolution and the transformation of social protection. In M. R. Busemeyer, A. Kemmerling, P. Marx, & K. Van Kersbergen (Eds.), Digitalization and the welfare state (pp. 99–117). Oxford University Press.

Kenworthy, L., & Pontusson, J. (2005). Rising inequality and the politics of redistribution in affluent countries. Perspectives on Politics, 3(3), 449–471.

Korinek, A. (2019). Labor in the age of automation and artificial intelligence. [Research Brief], Economics for Inclusive Prosperity. https://econfip.org/policy-briefs/labor-in-the-age-of-automation-and-artificial-intelligence/

Krein, J. D., Manzano, M., Teixeira, M., & Lemos, P. (Eds.). (2021). O trabalho pós-reforma trabalhista. CESIT-IE-UNICAMP. https://pesquisa.ie.unicamp.br/cesit/reforma-trabalhista/lancamento-o-trabalho-pos-reforma-trabalhista-28-6/

Kristal, T. (2013). The capitalist machine: Computerization, workers’ power, and the decline in labor’s share within US industries. American Sociological Review, 78, 361–389.

Kristal, T., & Edler, S. (2021). Computers meet politics at wage structure: An analysis of the computer wage premium across rich countries. Socio-Economic Review, 19(3), 837–868.

Lanzara, A. (2018). O seguro social e a construção da proteção do trabalho no Brasil. DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais, 61(2), 463–500.

Lanzara, A., & Salgado Silva, B. (2023). As reformas previdenciárias no Brasil e a expansão da previdência complementar. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 38(111), 1–20.

Lanzara, A., & Cabria, J. V. B. (2025). Nova direita populista e proteção social: Uma interpretação sobre o caso brasileiro. Revista de Políticas Públicas, 29(1), 181–198.

Lapa. (2022). O trabalho em plataformas digitais e a pandemia da Covid-19: Análise dos dados da PNAD Covid-19/IBGE. In S. P. da Silva, C. H. L. Corseuil, & J. S. M. Costa (Eds.), Impactos da pandemia de Covid-19 no mercado de trabalho e na distribuição de renda no Brasil (pp. 285–396). IPEA. https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/entities/book/4a743a99-63a5-4f45-b4dc-8eeaf7a9674f

Lazonick, W., & Mazzucato, M. (2013). The risk-reward nexus in the innovation-inequality relationship: Who takes the risks? Who gets the rewards? Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 1093–1128.

Magaldi, T., Azaïs, C., Razafindrakoto, M., & Roubaud, F. (2024). Uma “escolha muito difícil”: CLT versus plataformas na avaliação dos trabalhadores brasileiros em uma abordagem quali-quanti. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, 28, 1–41.

Manzano, M., & Krein, A. (2020). A pandemia e o trabalho de motoristas e entregadores por aplicativos no Brasil. CESIT-UNICAMP. https://pesquisa.ie.unicamp.br/cesit/covid19_publica/a-pandemia-e-o-trabalho-de-motoristas-e-de-entregadores-por-aplicativo-no-brasil/

Milanovic, B. (2020). Capitalismo sem rivais: O futuro do sistema que domina o mundo. Todavia.

Mishel, L., & Bivens, J. (2021). Identifying the policy levers generating wage suppression and wage inequality. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/unequalpower/publications/wage-suppression-inequality/.

Picot, G. (2022). Political and institutional limits to the rise of platform work. In M. Busemeyer, A. Kemmerling, P. Marx, & K. Van Kersbergen (Eds.), Digitalization and the welfare state (pp. 237–254). Oxford University Press.

Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). Distributional national accounts: Methods and estimates for the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 553–609.

Polanyi, K. (2000). A grande transformação: As origens da nossa época. Campus.

Rahman, K. S., & Thelen, K. (2019). The rise of the platform business model and the transformation of twenty-first-century capitalism. Politics & Society, 47(2), 177–204.

Santos, M. M., Mariano, F. Z., Arraes, R. A., & Oliveira, C. S. (2021). A armadilha da sobreeducação no primeiro emprego: Evidências para o Brasil. Estudos Econômicos, 51(3), 415–452.

Shuai, C., & Wu, W. D. (2018). The impact of labor contract and labor union on social security right. Advances in Applied Sociology, 8(4), 306–318.

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

Swaan, A. de. (1988). In care of the state: Health care, education and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era. Polity Press.

Thelen, K. (2018). Regulating Uber: The politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16, 938–953.

Tilly, C., & Tilly, C. (1998). Work under capitalism. Routledge.

Visser, J., & Checchi, D. (2009). Trade unions and inequality. In W. Salverda, B. Nolan, & T. Smeeding (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic inequality (pp. 230–256). Oxford University Press.

Wren, A. (2021). Strategies for growth and employment creation in a service based economy: Skill formation, equality, and the welfare state. In A. Hassel & B. Palier (Eds.), Growth and welfare in advanced capitalist economies: How have growth regimes evolved? (pp. 255–288). Oxford University Press.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.

Zysman, J., & Kenney, M. (2018). The next phase in the digital revolution: Intelligent tools, platforms, growth, and employment. Communications of the ACM, 61(2), 54–63.

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Arnaldo Provasi Lanzara, Yuri Oliveira Lima, Bruno Salgado Silva, Renato Boschi

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.