HERITAGE AND MEMORY COLLECTIONS: EDUCATING FOR THE CONSCIOUS PRESERVATION OF VESUVIAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL BUILT.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20888/bwydf547Keywords:
Conservação patrimonial; Educação cidadã; Pompeia.Abstract
This article discusses the conscious preservation of Vesuvian archaeological built as a collection of memories. We focus on the case of the Archaeological Park of Pompeii (Campania, Italy), which in 2025 inaugurated the Pompeii Children's Museum, the first museum experience aimed at children in an archaeological area in Italy. This educational approach organizes workshops and creative activities for Italian and foreign school groups from a parco diffuso perspective, based on Fredi Drugman's (1982) concept of museo diffuso, an initiative that integrates with the other sites of Greater Pompeii (Boscoreale, Oplontis, Stabiae). In fact, the Vesuvian cities of ruins, par excellence, should be understood through experiences and interactions as open collections, integral parts of human history, in constant conservation and transformation, places of full heritage education and promotion of global citizenship. Then method used in this research draws on neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and phenomenology to propose effective educational tools children's learning. This approach is justified given that, in contemporary society, the boundaries between phenomena tend to disappear completely and progressively give way to fluid practices and forms of hybrid and relative authenticity that unite past and present, education and entertainment, culture and market, history and citizenship. This scenario profoundly alters the inherent conception of the value of archaeological built, which is why the proposed theoretical model presents mechanisms that encourage social integration through the promotion of transgenerational educational.
Downloads
References
ABUL-AKEL, Ahmad. A neurobiological mapping of theory of mind. In: Brain Research Reviews. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing, 2003, p. 29-40.
AGOSTIANO, Maria; PANE, Andrea. Indirizzi operativi per una fruizione ampliata del sito archeologico di Pompei. In: PICONE, Renata. (ed.) Pompei Accessibile. Per una fruizione ampliata del sito archeologico. Roma: «L’ERMA» di BRETSCHNEIDER, 2014, p. 445-458.
ALARCÃO, Jorge. A escrita do tempo e a sua verdade. Ensaios de epistemologia da Arqueologia. Colecção Caminhos N.º 2. Coimbra: Quarteto Editora, 2000.
ARISTOTLE. Metaphysics. Books 1-9. Translated by Hugh Tredennick. Vol. 1. Loeb Classical Library. Cambrigde: Havard University Press, 1933.
AURÉLIO, Diogo. O mais natural dos Regimes. Espinosa e a Democracia. Lisboa: Temas e Debates – Círculo de Debates, 2014.
BASU, Chandreyi. The heavily ornamented female figure from Pompeii. In: VENETUCCI, Beatrice. (ed.) Il fascino dell’Oriente nelle collezioni e nei musei d’Italia. Rome: Artemide Publishers, 2010, p. 59-63.
BERNAL, Darío. (et al.). Anfore ebusitane e commercio a Pompei (III-I secolo a.C.): l’evidenza del Progetto I.E. (Impianto Elettrico, 1980-1981) nell’area del Foro. In: ARÉVALO GONZÁLEZ, Alicia. (et al.). (eds.) Ebusus y Pompeya, ciudades marítimas. Testimonios monetales de uma relación. Cádiz: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz, 2013, p. 257-273.
BIOGIOLI, Francesca. Space, number, and geometry from Helmholtz to Cassirer. Cham: Springer. 2016.
BIOGIOLI, Francesca. Articulating space in terms of transformation groups: Helmholtz and Cassier. In: Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy. Vol. 6. N.º 3. Open-Access Journal, 2018, p. 115-131.
BOTTON, Alain de. The architecture of happiness. The secret art of furnishing your life. New York: Vintage Books, 2006.
BRADY, Timothy. (et al.). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 105. N.º 38. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 2008, p. 14325-14329.
BUBER, Martin. I and Thou. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1950.
CAPECCI, Angelo. Final causality and teleological system in Aristotle. In: TYMIENIECKA, Anne-Teresa (ed.) The Teleologies in Husserlian Phenomenology. Vol. 9. Dordrecht: Sprinter, 1979, p.33-62.
CERCHIAI, Luca. Pompei le città della Campania Antica. In: LIPPOLIS, Enzo.; OSANNA, Massimo (eds.) I Pompeiani e i loro dei. Culti, rituali e funzioni sociali a Pompei. Roma: Edizioni Quasar, 2017, p. 5-9.
CICERO. De Oratore in two volumes, with an english translation by E. W. Sutton. Loeb Classical Library. Cambrigde: Havard University Press. 1958.
CORBÍ, Mariano. Principles of an Epistemology of Values. The permutation of collective cohesion and motivation. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
CRESPO LEÓN, Antonio. La inferencia inconsciente el Helmholtz: su papel en el proceso perceptual. In: Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada. Vol. 42. N.º 4. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Psicologia Aplicada y Orientación Professional, 1989, p. 441-447.
DAMÁSIO, António. Ao encontro de Espinosa. As emoções sociais e a neurologia do sentir. Lisboa: Temas e Debates – Círculo de Leitores, 2017.
DANIELSSON, Christina. Experiencing Architecture – Exploring the soul of the eye. In: Tech, L. (ed.) AARC 2011. Considering Research upon current themes in Architecture Research. AARC Conference Repository Online, 2014, p. 95-102.
DI BARI, Cosimo. A passo di critica. Il modello di Media Education nell’opera di Umberto Eco. Firenze: University Press, 2009.
DZIB GOODIN, Alma. La evolución del aprendizaje: más allá de las redes neuronales. In: Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología. Vol. 8. Issue. 1. Santiago: Universidad del Desarrollo, 2013, p. 20-25.
DURKHEIM, Émile. As regras do método sociológico. 3ª ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
ECO, Umberto. Il pendolo di Foucault. Milano: Bompiani Editore,1988.
ECO, Umberto. Contro la perdita della memoria. ONU – New York, 21/10/2013.
EISENBERGER, Naomi. Social pain and the brain: controversies, questions, and where to go from here. In: Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 66. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2015, p. 601-629.
ESPERDIÃO-ANTONIO, Vanderson. (et al.). Neurobiologia das emoções. In: Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica. Vol. 35. No 2. Edição Online, 2008, p. 55-65.
FRANCIOSI, Vincenzo. Pompei: lo sviluppo urbanistico. In: DE SIMONE, Girolamo; MACFARLANE, Roger. (eds.) Apolline Project: studies on Vesuvius’s north slope and the Bay of Naples. Quaderni della Ricerca Scientifica 14. Roma: Herder Libreria Editrice, 2009, p. 77-86.
FREIRE, Paulo. Educação como prática da liberdade. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Paz e Terra, 1967.
GALLO, Luigi. Per una storia del paesaggio culturale: Pompei. In: OSANNA, Massimo. (eds.) Pompei e l’Europa. Atti del Convegno. Milano: Mondadori Electa, 2015, p. 108-118.
GUARDINI, Romano. Power and Responsibility. A course of action for the new age. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1961.
HALBWACHS, Maurice. La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France,1950.
HARARI, Maurizio. Il delitto e lo scavo. In: Cremante, R. (et al.). (eds.) I misteri di Pompei. Antichità pompeiane nell’immaginario della modernità. Atti della Giornata di Studio Pavia, Collegio Ghislieri, 1 marzo 2007. Pompei: Flavius, 2010, p. 147-158.
HART-DAVID, Adam. The book of Time: the secrets of Time, how it works and how we measure it. London: Mitchell Beazley, 2011.
HATFIELD, Gary. Helmholtz and Philosophy: science, perception, and metaphysics, with variations on some fichtean themes. In: Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy. Vol. 6. N.º 3. Open-Access Journal, 2018, p. 11-41.
HERSHENSON, Maurice. Visual Space Perception: a Primer. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Prag: Academia Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1939.
ICOMOS/ICAHM. Carta de Lausanne: Carta para a proteção e gestão do patrimônio arqueológico. In: IPHAN. Cartas Patrimoniais. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Iphan, 2004. p. 303-310.
KRUKS, Sonia. The philosophy of Merleau-Ponty. In: Radical Philosophy Eleven. London: Not Stated, 1975, p. 17-24.
LE GOFF, Jacques. História e memória. 5. ed. Campinas, SP: Ed. da Unicamp, 2003.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel. Totalité et infini. Essai sur l’extériorité. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff, 1961.
LIPOVETSKY, Gilles; SERROY, Jean. L’écran global: culture-médias et cinema à l’àge hypermoderne. Paris: Éditions du Seiul, 2007.
LOUW, Michael. The architectural promenade and the perception of time. In: South African Journal of Art History. Vol. 31. N.º 2. Cape Town: Art Historical Work Group of South Africa, 2016, p. 12-33.
MALEBRANCHE, Nicolas. De la recherche de la Vérité. Livre Second. De l’Imagination. Paris: Libraire Ch. Delagrave, 1883.
MANACORDA, Daniele. Archeologia tra ricerca, tutela e valorizzazione. In: Il Capiltale Culturale. Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage. Macerata: Tipografia San Giuseppe, 2010, p. 131-141.
MASSA-PAIRAULT, Françoise-Hélène. La Campanie avant Rome. Recherches actuelles et problems. In: Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne. Vol. 22. N.º 1. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de France – Comté, 1996, p. 33-61.
MC GILL CARTER, Tamara; KOLAROV, Iva. Human memory and recall: bridging the gap between encoding and recall of information. In: Journal of Clinical Review & Case Reports. Vol. 3. Issue 9. OPAST Online Publishing, 2018, p. 1-3.
MC INTOSH, Alison. Into the tourist’s mind: understanding the value of the heritage experience. In: Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. Vol. 8. Issue: 1. Taylor & Francis Online, 1999, p. 41-64.
MC LAUGHLIN, Brian. Perception, epistemic issues in. In: Craig, E. (ed) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 7. London: Routlegde, 1998, p. 293-299.
MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1945.
MESQUITA, Batja; DE LEERSNYDER, Jozefien: BOIGER, Michael. The cultural construction of emotions. In: Current Opinion in Psychology. Vol. 8. ScienceDirect Online, 2016, p. 31-36.
MESOUDI, Alex. Cultural evolution: how darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University Press, 2011.
MESOUDI, Alex. Cultural evolution: integrating Psychology, Evolution and Culture. In: Current Opinion in Psychology 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016, p. 17-22.
MEULDERS, Michel. Helmholtz: from enlightenment to neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
MONTEIX, Nicolas. 2024. Chaînes opératoires et organisation humaine de la production: travailler dans les boulangeries de Pompéi. In: CHEVAL, Carole. (et al.). (éd.) Acteurs techniques, Acteurs sociaux: des vestiges matériels à l’organisation sociale du travail de la Préhistoire à nos jours. Nice: Éditions APDCA, 2024, p. 141-153.
MOUNIER, Emmanuel. Personalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950.
NDORO, Webber. Conservation and management of Archaeological Heritage Resources. In: HERITAGE, Alison; COPITHORNE, Jennifer (eds.) Sharing Conservation Decisions. Current Issues and Future Strategies. Rome: ICCROM, 2018, p.15-26.
NORRIS, Dennis. Short-term memory and Long-term memory are still different. In: Psychological Bulletin. Advance Online Publication, 2017, p. 1-18.
OSANNA, Massimo. Pompei: la prossimità del passato. In: OSANNA, Massimo; VILIANI, Andrea (eds.) Pompei@Madre. Materia Archeologica. Milano: Mondadori Electa, 2017, p. 90-101.
OSANNA, Massimo. Restaurando Pompei: un bilancio in progress. In: OSANNA, Massimo.; PICONE, Renata. (eds.) Restaurando Pompei. Riflessioni a margine del Grande Progetto. Studi e Ricerche del Parco Archeologico di Pompei 38. Roma: «L’ERMA» di BRETSCHNEIDER, 2018, p. 19- 20.
OSANNA, Massimo; VERGER, Stéphane (eds.) Pompei e gli Etruschi. Milano: Mondadori Electa, 2018, p. 13-19.
PAPALE, Paolo (et al.). When Neuroscience ‘touches’ Architecture: from hapticity to a supramodal functioning of the human brain. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 7. Article: 866. Open-Access Academic Journal, 2016, p. 1-8.
PATTON, Lydia. Helmholtz’s physiological psychology. In: LAPOINTE, Sandra (ed.) Philosophy of Mind in the Nineteenth Century. Vol. 5. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018, p. 1- 20.
PESANDO, Fabrizio. (et al.). Rileggere Pompei. III. Ricerche sulla Pompei Sannitica (Campagne di scavo 2006-2008). Quaderni di Studi Pompeiani IV. Pompei: Associazione Internazionale Amici di Pompei, 2010.
PHELPS, Elizabeth; LEMPERT, Karoline; SOKOL-HESSNER, Peter. Emotion and decision making: multiple modulatory neural circuits. In: Annual Review of Neuroscience. Vol. 37. New York: Annual Reviews, 2014, p. 263-287.
RADKE, Gerhard. Viæ Publicæ Romanæ. Bologna: Cappelli Editore, 1981.
SATNE, Glenda. Interaction and self-correction. In: Di Paolo, E.; De Jaegher, H. (eds.) Frontiers research topics. Towards an embodied science of intersubjectivity widening scope of social understanding reseach. Vol. 5. Article 798. Frontiers in Psychology Online, 2014, p. 94-104.
SBERGA, Adair; MASSINI, Marina. A formação da pessoa em Edith Stein, princípios educativos e aproximação com o Sistema Preventivo de Dom Bosco. In: Revista de Ciência da Educação. Ano: XVII. N.º 32. São Paulo: UNISAL Americana, 2015, p. 209-228.
SCHAVERIEN, Joy. Art, dreams and active imagination: a post-Jungian approach to transference and the image. In: Journal of Analytical Psychology. Vol. 50. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005, p. 127-153.
SHANKS, Michael; TILLEY, Christopher. Social theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.
SIMONETTI, Cristián. 2014. With the past under your feet: on the development of time concepts in Archaeology. In: Ramos, A.; Cayón, L. (eds.) Anuário Antropológico 2013/ II. Brasília: Letras Livres, 2014, p. 283-313.
SMITH, David; MC INTYRE, Ronald. Husserl and Intentionality. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing, 1982.
SPINOZA, Baruch. Opera Philosophica Omnia editit et præfationem adjecit A. Gfroerer. Stuttgardiæ: Typis J. B. Mezleri, 1830.
STEIN, Edith. Endliches und Ewiges Sein. Versuch Eines Aufstiegs Zum Sinn Des Seins. Band II. Louvain: Editions Nauwelaerts, 1962a.
STEIN, Edith. Welt und Person. Beitrag Zum Christlichen Wahrheitsstreben. Band IV. Freiburg: Verlag Herder, 1962b.
STEIN, Edith. Potency and Act. Studies Toward a Philosophy of Being. Washington: Institute of Carmelite Studies Publications, 2009.
THIEBAUT DE SCHOTTEN, Michel (et al.). Subdivision of the occipital lobes: an anatomical and functional MRI connectivity study. In: Cortex XXX. Ensevier Science Direct, 2012, p. 1-17.
TURNER, Robert. Helmholtz, Herman von. In: Kazdin, A. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Psychology. Vol. 4. Oxford: University Press, 2000, p. 109-111.
TURNER, Robert. (et al.). Neuroanthropology: a humanisctic science for the study of the culture- brain nexus. In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. Vol. 5. N.os 2-3. Oxford: University Press, 2009, p. 138-147.
VÁZQUEZ SANCHEZ, Juan. The cognitive architecture of perception. Penafiel: Invulgar – Artes Gráficas, 2014.
VON HELMHOLTZ, Hermann. Recent progress in the Theory of Vision. In: Selected writings of Hermann von Helmholtz. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1971a. p. 144- 222.
VON HELMHOLTZ, Hermann. The facts of Perception. In: Selected writings of Hermann von Helmholtz. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1971b, p. 366-408.
WELSH, Talia. The child as natural phenomenologist: primal and primary experience in Merleau-Ponty’s Psychology. Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ridphe_R, Ibero-American Journal of Historical-Educational Patrimony
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são de exclusividade da revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não comerciais. Sendo utilizados dados ou o artigo completo para outros fins, o autor deverá solicitar por escrito autorização ao editor para tais fins.
A RIDPHE_R Revista Iberoamericana do Patrimônio Histórico-Educativo utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Licença utilizada: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Aviso de derechos de autor
Los derechos de autor para artículos publicados en esta revista son de exclusiva de la revista. En virtud de aparecer en esta revista de acceso público, los artículos son de uso gratuito, con atribuciones propias, en aplicaciones educativas y no comerciales. Si se utilizan datos o el artículo completo para otros fines, el autor deberá solicitar por escrito autorización al editor para tales fines.
La RIDPHE_R Revista Iberoamericana del Patrimonio Histórico-Educativo utiliza la licencia de Creative Commons (CC), preservando así la integridad de los artículos en ambiente de acceso abierto.
Licencia usada: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
