Mots-clés
Innovation technologique
Algorithme
Gig economy
Comment citer
Résumé
Les nouvelles formes de travail passent par un cadre complexe et dense: l'algorithmisation. Tous les individus y sont soumis à une nouvelle forme de capitalisme qui accroît le pouvoir et la surveillance. En conséquence, les travailleurs sont sous l'égide de patrons immatériels et virtuels, sous forme d'algorithmes, qui exploitent leur travail et le poussent vers la précarité. Une nouvelle forme de travail est en train de naître, dans laquelle les droits des travailleurs ne sont pas garantis et où les relations de travail sont affaiblies. Cet article traite de la manière dont l'algorithmisation a rendu possible le travail liquide et précaire, à partir d'un essai sur les nouvelles formes de travail réalisées par l'environnement numérique. L'objectif principal de l'essai est de contribuer aux discussions sur le travail plateformisé et ses répercussions sociales, face à une structure de surveillance constante et à des relations de pouvoir qui reconfigurent une logique sociale dans laquelle les algorithmes ont un pouvoir sur les travailleurs.
Références
Abernathy, W., & Clark, K. (1985). Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6
Andrejevic, M. (2019). Automating surveillance. Communications & Media Studies, 17(1-2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12930
Antunes, R. (2018). O privilégio da servidão: o novo proletariado de serviços na era digital. Boitempo.
Antunes, R. (2020). Trabalho digital, “indústria 4.0” e uberização do trabalho. In: R. de L. Carelli, T. M. Cavalcanti, & V. P. da Fonseca (Orgs.), Futuro do trabalho: os efeitos da revolução digital na sociedade (pp. 347-356). ESMPU.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2010). The market for technology. Economics of Innovation, 1, 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01015-4
Bauman, Z. (2001). Modernidade líquida. Zahar.
Berger, T., Chen, C., & Frey, C. (2018). Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect. European Economic Review, 110, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.006
Bocconcelli, R., Cioppi, M., Fortezza, F., Francioni, B., Pagano, A., Savelli, E., & Splendiani, S. (2018). SMEs and marketing: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12128
Bourdieu, P. (2005). O campo econômico. Política & Sociedade, 4(6), 15–58.
Casilli, A. (2019). En attendant les robots: Enquête sur le travail du clic. Seuil.
Chomsky, N. (2013). Mídia: Política propaganda e manipulação. WMF.
Crary, J. (2016). 24/7: Capitalismo tardio e os fins do sono. Ubu.
Dedecca, C. S. (2010). Trabalho, financeirização e desigualdade. [Texto para Discussão, n. 174], Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. https://www.eco.unicamp.br/images/arquivos/artigos/1804/texto174.pdf
Dedecca, C. S. (2012). Desigualdade, mas de qual falamos? Revista de Economia Política, 32(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572012000100004
Denis, J. (2019). Le travail invisible des données. Presses des Mines.
Druck, G. (2011). Trabalho, precarização e resistências: novos e velhos desafios? Caderno CRH, 24(spe. 1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-49792011000400004
Druck, G. (2021). A tragédia neoliberal, a pandemia e o lugar do trabalho. O Social em Questão, 24(49), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.OSQ.51098
Fagerberg, J., Martin, B., & Andersen, E. (2013). Innovation studies: Towards a new agenda. Oxford. In J. Fagerberg, B. Martin, & E. Andersen (Eds.), Innovation studies: Evolution and future challenges. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686346.003.0001
Finoti, L., Didonet, S., Toaldo, A., & Martins, T. (2017). The role of the marketing strategy process in the innovativeness-performance relationship of SMEs. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(3), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-01-2016-0005
Flores, O., & Rayle, L. (2016). How cities use regulation for innovation: the case of Uber, Lyft and Sidecar in San Francisco. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3756–3768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.232
Foucault, M. (1987). Vigiar e punir: o nascimento da prisão. (27a ed.). Vozes.
Hall, B., Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (vol. 1, pp. 609-639). North-Holland, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
Hall, B., & Rosenberg, N. (2010). Introduction to the handbook. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (vol. 1, pp. 3-9). North-Holland, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01001-4
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment interest and money. Macmillan Cambridge University Press.
Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). Gamification in learning and education. Springer.
Malthus, T. (1820). Principles of political economy. William Pickering.
Marx, K. (1867/2023). O capital (Livro 1). Boitempo.
Mattos, F. A. M. de (2021). A relevância da obra de Simon Kuznets para o debate sobre a distribuição de renda desde o pós-segunda guerra. Economia Ensaios, 36(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.14393/REE-v36n1a2021-50512
Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2018). Reinveting capitalism in the age of big data. Hachette Book.
Mrugalska, B., & Wyrwicka, M. K. (2017). Towards lean production in industry 4.0. Procedia Engineering, 182, 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.135
Nelson, R., Dosi, G., Helfat, C., Pyka, A., Saviotti, P., Lee, K., Dopfer, K., Malerba, F., & Winter, S. (2018). Modern evolutionary economics: an overview. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108661928
Palma, J. G. (2009). The revenge of the market on the rentiers. Why neo-liberal reports of the end of history turned out to be premature. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4), 829–869. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep037
Rajput, S., & Singh, S. (2019). Connecting circular economy and industry 4.0. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.002
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray.
Rodrigues, R. J. R., Silva, R. J., & Leal, C. T. P. (2019). Gamification in management education: A systematic literature review. Brazilian Administration Review, 16(2), e180103. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2019180103
Sahal, D. (1981). Alternative conceptions of technology. Research Policy, 10(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(81)90008-1
Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
Slee, T. (2019). Uberização: a nova onda do trabalho precarizado. Editora Elefante.
Streek, W. (2018). Tempo comprado: A crise adiada do capitalismo democrático. Boitempo.
van Doorn, N. (2020). Stepping stone or dead end? The ambiguities of platform-mediated domestic work under conditions of austerity. Comparative landscapes of austerity and the gig economy: New York and Berlin. In D. Baines & I. Cunningham (Eds.), Working in the context of austerity: Challenges and struggles (pp. 49-69). Bristol University Press.
Zuboff, S. (2021). A era do capitalismo de vigilância. Intrínseca.
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
(c) Copyright Herbert Paolo Salles de Oliveira, Jorge Nogueira de Paiva Britto, Fernando Augusto Mansor de Mattos 2024