Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper studies how the six topics (question of author, method, contents, beginning, cause anel finality) that constitute Greek historiography as narrative memory of past were used by Cicero in his rhetorical definition of historia.References
AMBRÓSIO, R. Cícero e a história. Revista de história. Vol. 147, p. 9-31, 2002.
CHIAPPETTA, A. “Não diferem o historiador e o poeta...” O texto histórico como instrumento e objeto de trabalho. Língua e literatura. Vol. 22, p. 15-34, 1996.
ECKSTEIN, A. M. Notes on the birth and death of Polybius. AJPh. Vol. 113.3. p. 387-406, 1992.
HERNÁNDEZ, M. V. Cicerón creador de su imagen política: Fam., V. 12. Faventia. Vol. 19.1, p. 17-33. 1997.
LEEMAN, A. D. Le genre et le style historique à Rome: théorie et pratique. REL. Vol. 33. p. 183-208, 1955.
MARINCOLA, J. Authority and tradition in ancient historiography, Cambridge: University Press, 1997 (reimp. 1999).
MARINCOLA, J. Greek historians. Greece & Rome. Vol. 31, 2001.
MOMIGLIANO. A. History between medicine and rhetoric. In. Ottavo contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Storia e Letteratura. Roma: 1987.
MUSTI. D. (org.). La storiografia greca. Guida storica e critica. Roma/Bari: Laterza, 1979.
PÉDECH, P. Notes sur la biographie de Polybe. LEC. Vol. 29, p. 145-156, 1961.
PIRES. F. M. Mithistória. São Paulo: Humanitas, 1999.
WOODMAN, A. J. Rhetoric in classical historiography. Portland: Areopagitica Press, 1988.
When submitting papers to PhaoS, authors should be aware that PhaoS shall hold all relevant copyrights over such papers if they are accepted for publication. Manuscripts will not be returned.