Palabras clave
Ocde
Gobernanza global
Sociología organizacional
Métricas
Cómo citar
Resumen
Este artículo presenta un análisis conceptual del Programa para la Evaluación Internacional de Estudiantes (PISA) de la OCDE, sob la perspectiva de la sociología organizacional. A partir de una revisión narrativa de la literatura, el artículo explora factores que subyacen a la prominencia actual de PISA, utilizando conceptos derivados de enfoques de sistemas racionales, eficiencia social y neoinstitucionalismo. Del análisis de sus fundamentos de PISA, lógica de funcionamiento e impactos, la principal conclusión es que el poder y las limitaciones de PISA funcionan como un espejo, que refleja aspectos del diseño del programa y características de la OCDE movilizados por apoyadores y críticos en direcciones opuestas. Dado el atractivo de PISA para los formuladores de políticas, el artículo sugiere realizar más investigaciones que podrían revelar su potencial para el aprendizaje transcultural, en lugar de reforzarlo como una herramienta global para la rendición de cuentas y la estandarización.
Referencias
Addey, C. (2021). Passports to the Global South, UN flags, favourite experts: Understanding the interplay between UNESCO and the OECD within the SDG4 context. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1862643
Andrews, P., & et al. (2014, May 6). OECD and Pisa tests are damaging education worldwide. The Guardian, 6 May. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/06/oecd-pisa-tests-damaging-education-academics
Auld, E., Xiaomin, L., & Morris, P. (2020). Piloting PISA for Development to success: An analysis of its findings, framework and recommendations. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1852914
Davies, S., & Zarifa, D. (2009). New institutional theory and the Weberian tradition. In C. Levine-Rasky (Ed.), Canadian perspectives on the sociology of education (pp. 3–12). Oxford University Press.
Davis, G., & Scott, W. R. (2015). Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315663371
Fischman, G. E., Topper, A. M., Silova, I., Goebel, J., & Holloway, J. L. (2019). Examining the influence of international large-scale assessments on national education policies. Journal of Education Policy, 34(4), 470–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1460493
Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116658299
Grey, S., & Morris, P. (2023). Educational accountability, international large scale assessments and PISA: Powerful influences based on weak foundations. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (pp. 181–191). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09062-X
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. A. (2018). Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
Jabbar, H., & Menashy, F. (2022). Economic Imperialism in Education Research: A Conceptual Review. Educational Researcher, 51(4), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211066114
Jakobi, A. P., & Martens, K. (2010). Expanding and Intensifying Governance: The OECD in Education Policy. In Mechanisms of OECD Governance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591145.001.0001
Kamens, D. H. (2013). Globalization and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for “best practices” and magic bullets. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power, and Policy (pp. 117–140). Symposium Books.
Klees, S. J. (2016). Human capital and rates of return: Brilliant ideas or ideological dead ends? Comparative Education Review, 60(4), 644–672. https://doi.org/10.1086/688063
Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017). A new global policy regime founded on invalid statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and economic growth. Comparative Education, 53(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008
Labaree, D. F. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–14.
Lewis, S. (2019). Historicizing New Spaces and Relations of the OECD’s Global Educational Governance: PISA for Schools and PISA4U. In C. Ydesen (Ed.), The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education: The formation of a global governing complex (pp. 269–289). Palgrave Macmillan.
Martens, K., & Wolf, K. D. (2009). Boomerangs and Trojan Horses: The Unintended Consequences of Internationalising Education Policy Through the EU and the OECD. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research (pp. 81–107). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9505-4_4
McGaw, B. (2008). The role of the OECD in international comparative studies of achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940802417384
MEC. (2019). Pisa 2018 revela baixo desempenho escolar em Leitura , Matemática e Ciências no Brasil. Ministério da Educação. http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83191:pisa-2018-revela-baixo-desempenho-escolar-em-leitura-matematica-e-ciencias-no-brasil&catid=211&Itemid=86
Mehta, J. (2013). The allure of order: High hopes, dashed expectations, and the troubled quest to remake American schooling. Oxford University Press.
Mehta, J., & Peterson, A. (2019). International learning communities: What happens when leaders seek to learn across national boundaries? Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09348-0
Meyer, H.-D. (2014). Imagining PISA’s policy futures: A postscript and some extensions to the open letter to andreas schleicher. Policy Futures in Education, 12(7), 883–892. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2014.12.7.883
Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (2013). PISA and the Globalization of Education Governance: Some puzzles and problems. In H.-Di. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power, and Policy (Oxford Stu, pp. 9–26). Symposium Books.
Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (2016). Introduction: The globalization of education policy – Key approaches and debates. In The Handbook of Global Education Policy (pp. 1–20). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch0
Niemann, D., & Martens, K. (2015). Monitoring Standards of Education Worldwide: PISA and its consequences. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research in International Education (2nd ed., pp. 488–497). Sage Publications.
Niemann, D., & Martens, K. (2018). Soft governance by hard fact? The OECD as a knowledge broker in education policy. Global Social Policy, 18(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018118794076
OECD. (n.d.). PISA for Schools—PISA. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-for-schools/
OECD. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States: Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018a). PISA for Development: Results in focus (91; PISA in Focus). OECD.
OECD. (2018b). Programme for International Student Assessment. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Ozga, J. (2023). Accountability in an age of international testing. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (pp. 306–312). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09054-0
Rivas, A., & Scasso, M. G. (2019). Low stakes, high risks: The problem of intertemporal validity of PISA in Latin America. Journal of Education Policy, 00(00), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1696987
Schiro, M. (2013). Social Efficiency Ideology. In Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns (2nd ed., pp. 57–98).
Schleicher, A. (2014, May 8). Pisa programme not about short-term fixes. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/08/pisa-programme-short-term-fixes#:~:text=The%20letter%20by%20Dr%20Heinz,operation%20and%20Development's%20Pisa%20programme.
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations.
Scott, J. C. (2020). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.12987/9780300252989
Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3120
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2019). Conclusions: What Policy-Makers Do with PISA The Power of Soft Power. In F. Waldow & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Understanding PISA’s Attractiveness: Critical Analyses in Comparative Policy Studies. Bloomsbury Academic. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350057319
Waldow, F. (2017). Projecting images of the ‘good’ and the ‘bad school’: Top scorers in educational large-scale assessments as reference societies. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(5), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1262245
Wiseman, A. (2013). Policy responses to PISA in comparative perspective. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power, and Policy (pp. 303–322). Symposium Books.
Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09367-x
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 Tatiana Feitosa de Britto