Banner Portal
Socially produced qualification or quantification of probable events? the concept of risk articulating a technological scientific dispute
PDF (Portuguese)

Keywords

Science
Technology
Environmentalism
probability
Probability
Possibility
Risk

Métricas

How to Cite

L’HOSTE, Ana Spivak. Socially produced qualification or quantification of probable events? the concept of risk articulating a technological scientific dispute. Tematicas, Campinas, SP, v. 12, n. 23, p. 9–24, 2004. DOI: 10.20396/tematicas.v12i23/24.13595. Disponível em: https://econtents.sbu.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13595. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2026.

Abstract

This paper states and analyzes different ways of risk conceptualization articulated in a discussion between scientists, technologists and members of environmentalist movements. This discussion, related to nuclear research, development and production is originated both by the sale to Australia of a reactor for research and medical applications designed by an argentinean company and the signature of a Cooperation Agreement in Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between both governments. Under this debate lies various ways of conceptualizing risk that depends on the social actors and their postures regarding the conflict. From one point of view risk implies just a statistics probability related to the rate cost/benefit. From another perspective risk contents is settled taking into account the dimension and quality of its possible consequences. The analysis of these conceptions from an ethnographic approach shows the possibilities of risk as an analytic category useful to make a profound study of the specific process, values, know ledges and projects that constitute social life.

PDF (Portuguese)

References

ADAM, B. Y VAN LOON, J. Repositioning risk; the challenge for so­cial theory. En ADAM, B. et al "The risk society and beyond" Critical Is­sues for Social Science. London: Sage, 2000, p. 1-32.

BECK, U. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage, 1992, p. 21.

BECK, U. Risk Society and the providence state. En Lash et al, Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. London: Sage, 1996, p. 27- 43.

CORTAZAR, J. Rayuela. Buenos Aires: Alfaguara, 1996, p. 366.

DOUGLAS, M. Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London and New York: Routledge, 1992.

DOUGLAS, M. La aceptabilidad del riesgo. Barcelona: Paidos, 1996.

GEERTZ, C. La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1973, p. 334.

GIDDENS, A. Modernidade e identidade. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2002.

IRWIN, A., ALLAM, S. e I. WELSH Nuclear risk: three problematic. En ADAM, B et al The risk society and beyond. Critical Issues for Social Science. London: Sage, 2000, p. 78-122.

LASH, S.; SZERSZYNSKI, B. e B. WYNNE. Ecology, realism, and the social science. En LASH et al Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. London: Sage, 1996, p. 1-26.

SPIVAK L'HOSTE, A. Aproximación etnográfica a un conflicto en el campo científico y tecnológico: la venta del reactor RRR a Australia. Buenos Aires, 2003. Tesis (Maestría en Política y Gestión de la Ciencia y la Tecno­logía), Centro de Estudios Avanzados, Universidad de Buenos Ai­res.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2004 Ana Spivak L'Hoste

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.