Banner Portal
University Extension in Health: a gender issue
PDF (Portuguese)

Supplementary Files

ERRATA (Portuguese)

Keywords

University extension
Gender
Health
Glass Ceiling
Integrative and complementary Practices (PIC)

Métricas

How to Cite

Cintra, M., Nascimento, J. L. do, & Barros, N. F. de. (2024). University Extension in Health: a gender issue. International Journal of Outreach and Community Engagement, 5(00), e024006 . https://doi.org/10.20396/ijoce.v5i00.18456

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the presence of women in university settings. However, there is still a significant disparity between genders in certain areas of knowledge and in occupying leadership positions. This disparity is also noticed in terms of the dedication of faculty members to the so-called "university tripod," composed of teaching, research, and extension activities. Objective: This article aims to understand gender disparities in university extension in the field of health, particularly in extension activities that address Integrative and Complementary Practices. Methodology: Considering the established objectives, a descriptive quantitative analysis of the set of health extension activities submitted and approved by ProExt/MEC during its validity period (2010-2016) is carried out. Secondly, the curricula of the coordinating faculty members of these activities are analyzed to outline their career profile (experience with extension, research projects, publications, etc.). Finally, these quantitative results are discussed based on the theoretical framework, relating them to the "glass ceiling" theory. Discussion: The glass ceiling is present in university settings, restricting women's access to leadership positions, social prestige, and decision-making. It was also observed that female faculty members are predominantly responsible for health extension activities and that their relationship with extension is organic and long-lasting, unlike their male colleagues. This fact is even more pronounced when it comes to extension activities that focus on Integrative and Complementary Practices.

PDF (Portuguese)

References

BELLACASA, M. P. de la. Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things. Social Studies of Science, v. 41, n. 1, p. 85-106, Feb. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0306312710380301.

BOLZANI, Vanderlan da Silva. Mulheres na ciência: por que ainda somos tão poucas?. Ciência e Cultura, [S.L.], v. 69, n. 4, p. 56-59, out. 2017. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.21800/2317-66602017000400017.

FAGUNDEZ, Antonio; FREIRE, Paulo. Por uma pedagogia da pergunta. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2013.

FREIRE, P. Pedagogia do oprimido. 54. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra , 2013.

FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.

FREIRE, P. Ação cultural para a liberdade. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1981.

GEMAA. UERJ. Mulheres na ciência brasileira disponível em , acesso em 03 de março de 2023.

LETA, Jacqueline. As mulheres na ciência brasileira: crescimento, contrastes e um perfil de sucesso. Estudos Avançados, [S.L.], v. 17, n. 49, p. 271-284, dez. 2003. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142003000300016.

MELO, Hildete Pereira de; OLIVEIRA, André Barbosa. A produção científica brasileira no feminino. Cadernos Pagu, [S.L.], n. 27, p. 301-331, dez. 2006. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-83332006000200012.

SILVA, Fabiane Ferreira da; RIBEIRO, Paula Regina Costa. Trajetórias de mulheres na ciência. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), [S.L.], v. 20, n. 2, p. 449-466, abr. 2014. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-73132014000200012.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Outreach and Community Engagement

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.