Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of the professional doctorate in education in the United States and Brazil, highlighting the implications of the U.S. model—initially implemented in the 1920s—for the Brazilian context, where this type of program was formally established nearly a century later. In both countries, a longstanding challenge persists: to consolidate a distinct identity for the professional doctorate that clearly differentiates it from the academic doctorate and grants it the prestige necessary to achieve the expected social and educational impact. The article is structured into three main sections. The first two examine the Professional Doctorate in Education in the United States (Ed.D) and in Brazil (DPE), respectively. The final section offers recommendations for consolidating a distinct identity for the Brazilian DPE, focusing on faculty and student profiles, as well as defining activities and outputs.References
Balbachevsky, E., & Schwartzman, S. (2011). Brazil: Diverse experiences in institutional
governance in the public and private sectors. In W. Locke, W. Cummings, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education (pp. 35–56).
Springer.
Buss, R. R. (2018). How CPED guiding principles and design concepts influenced the
development and implementation of an Ed.D program. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Education Practice, 3(2), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2018.57
Calderón, A.-I., da Silva Wargas, B., Borochovicius, E., Wandercil, M., Pontes, M. P.,
Marinho de Barros, A., Brazier, F., & Koide, A. (2018). Doutorado Profissional em Educação: tendências em universidades de classe mundial contextualizadas nos
rankings acadêmicos internacionais. Práxis Educativa, 14(1), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.14n1.008
Deering, T. E. (1998). Eliminating the Doctor of Education Degree: It’s the Right Thing to Do. The Educational Forum, 62(3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729808984350
Foster, H. A., Chesnut, S., Thomas, J., & Robinson, C. (2023). Differentiating the EdD and the PhD in Higher Education: A Survey of Characteristics and Trends. Impacting
Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 8(1), 18–26.
https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.288
Fruchi, A. J., Calderón, A.-I., Salceda, J. P., & Bustos, M. F. (2024). From academic
doctorates to professional doctorates: Comparative analysis of experiences in Ibero-America. Ensaio: Avaliação E Políticas Públicas Em Educação, 32(122), e0243959. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362024003203959
Kot, F. C., & Hendel, D. D. (2012). Emergence and growth of professional doctorates in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.516356
Kumar, S., & Dawson, K. (2013). Exploring the impact of a professional practice education doctorate in educational environments. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(2),
165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.736380
Latta, M. M., & Wunder, S. (2012). Placing practitioner knowledge at the center of teacher education: Rethinking the policies and practices of the education doctorate.
Information Age Publishing.
Louie, K. (2024). The history of the doctorate in education (Ed.D): Past, present and future. Online Ed.D Programs. Retrieved June 21, 2025, from
https://www.onlineeddprograms.com/guides/history-of-the-edd
McCormick, A. C., & Borden, V. M. H. (2017). Higher education institutions, types and
classifications of. In Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and
institutions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_22-1
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2023). Fast facts. NCES. Retrieved June 21, 2025, from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
National Science Foundation. (2023). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2022. NSF. Retrieved June 21, 2025, from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf24300
Ottmann, G. (2006). Cidadania mediada: processos de democratização da política munici-pal no Brasil. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, (74), 155–175.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002006000100010
Perry, J. A. (2024). Reclaiming the education doctorate: A guidebook for (re)designing Ed.D programs. Myers Education Press.
Perry, J. A. (2013). The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate: The education
doctorate – a degree for our time [Introduction to Special Issue by the Guest Editor]. Planning and Changing: An Educational Leadership and Policy Journal, 44(3/4),
113–126.
Salter, D. W. (2013). One university’s approach to defining and supporting professional
doctorates. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.833030
Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming
Education’s Doctorates: A Critique and a Proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003025
Sousa Junior, L., & Verhine, R. E. (2020). Mestrados e doutorados profissionais como es-paços de formação. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 49, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle49.11
Story, V. A., & Hesbol, K. A. (2016). Contemporary approach to dissertation and research methods. Information Science Reference.
Writers of UoPeople. (2025). A comprehensive list of doctorate degrees just for you. Univer-sity of the People. Retrieved June 21, 2025, from
https://www.uopeople.edu/blog/list-of-doctorate-degrees/
Urban, W. J., Jennings, L. W., & Gailher, M. (2019). American education: A history.
Routledge.
U.S. News. (2025). 2025 Best Education Schools. Retrieved June 21, 2025, from
https://usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-education-schools/edu-rankings/
Verhine, R. E., & Dantas, L. V. (2024). Programas de pós-graduação a distância: Perspecti-vas da experiência internacional. Educação & Sociedade, 45, e283826. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES.283826
Verhine, R. E., & Siqueira, V. B. (2024). Pós-graduação e educação a distância. Jornal de Políticas Educacionais, 18, e94795. https://doi.org/10.5380/jpe.v18i1.94795

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Robert Verhine
